Targeted Provision - Quality Assurance Policy
Policy owner |
Chief Executive Officer |
|---|---|
Last updated |
|
Next update due |
1. Policy Purpose
Targeted Provision is focused solely on providing the highest quality education and support whilst creating the best possible outcomes for the high acuity children and young people (CYP) in the SEN/Care system.
Our objective is to provide bespoke personal tuition to a wide range of clients, and this can only be achieved if each member of our network performs to their maximum potential. We place a high value on ensuring the effectiveness and quality of each element of our services. It is the responsibility of everyone involved in the provision of services to read, understand, and implement this policy. Accordingly, the purpose of this policy is to ensure there is an effective and manageable system in place to evaluate consistency and quality in relation to:
Teaching and Learning:
Recruitment:
Referrals:
Management of human resources and culture:
Product design and functionality:
Business development:
Quality assurance and service improvement:
2. Responsibilities
Chief Executive Officer: (Working collaboratively with the Chief Financial Officer and Head of Partnerships)
Will be responsible for coordinating a strategic business improvement timetable and disseminating information.
Will explore opportunities to engage with new commissioning bodies and pursue new contracts and maintain existing partnerships.
Will interact with investors to map and manage financial security and business evolution.
Will ensure all policy and procedure documentation is in place, functional and updated in line with business activities.
Will ensure the business is promoted appropriately through social, printed and broadcasted media.
The Head of Education: (Working collaboratively with a dedicated specialist SEND support team)
Will maintain high quality educational provision.
Will review the quality of educational provision on a weekly basis and act upon any concerns raised.
Will sample and assess tutor performance against the current Teacher Standards and SEND CoP This will include:
Planning
Quality and use of assessment
Effectiveness and quality of marking and feedback
Rate of student progress
Standard of student work
Communication and reporting
Attendance and timekeeping
Interactions with stakeholders
Will ensure TP engages in the full graduated response and is present throughout the assess, plan, do and review cycle.
Will ensure the highest standards of safeguarding and child protection are maintained.
The Head of Recruitment: (Working collaboratively with the Head of People)
Will ensure the recruitment process is in line with safer recruitment guidelines.
Will ensure the recruitment process is sufficiently dynamic to attract and engage appropriately qualified and experienced tutors who are able to meet the needs of our cohort.
Will ensure effective and appropriate monitoring methods are in place regarding DBS, compulsory training and compliance.
The Chief Technology Officer:
Will ensure all applications and databases remain functional, up to date and support efficient business continuity.
Will develop new innovative systems and processes to support the core objectives of the business.
Will communicate with and direct developers to ensure an efficient and successful roll-out of new systems.
The Head of Referrals:
Will maintain high quality communication and collaboration with commissioning bodies.
Will ensure accurate matching of tutors with CYPs needs is achieved.
Will manage all logistical arrangements regarding individual referrals.
The Head of People: (Working collaboratively with the Head of Recruitment)
Will ensure a robust induction process is in place to support all new staff and tutors.
Will oversee all employee administration - PAYE, T&Cs, PP, compliance etc.
Will induce and maintain a positive, CYP focused culture across internal teams and tutor workforces.
Will ensure CPD, including mandatory training is up to date across all staff and tutors.
Will have oversight of all staff supervision and appraisal processes.
The Head of Quality Assurance:
Will have oversight of all self-assessment processes and ensure outcomes feed into the business development plan are time framed and evaluated.
Along with the Head of Partnerships will prepare for and conduct external QA audits including SEND, Safeguarding and compliance reviews.
Along with the Head of Partnerships will maintain individual online QA bases as requested by individual commissioners.
Will conduct random internal QA audits.
Will receive and act upon all feedback from CYP, parents/carers, commissioners and tutors.
3. Internal QA Audit
Random internal QA audits will be conducted using the Self-Evaluation Quality Assurance (QA) form (Appendix 2). Actions will be evaluated within four weeks of the audit and signed off or extended.
4. Evaluation of Teaching and Learning
All Tutors will be responsible for:
Organising the teaching and learning in their own subject areas according to the commissioning requirements.
Regularly mark/annotate their student’s work in line with this policy.
Produce effective planning of their teaching and learning activities.
Keep up-to-date records of all assessment decisions and student progress.
Manage the individual learning environments made available to them to maximise engagement and progress.
Regularly evaluate the effectiveness of their teaching and learning activities and implement changes based on their evaluations and as a result of QA audits.
Complete and submit session reports and conclusive reports highlighting progress, engagement and successful strategies to support outcomes.
Sampling will assess:
The effectiveness of planning.
Clear objectives for the lesson are evident.
Planned teaching activities address the objectives identified.
Individual objectives are evident and appropriate to the level at which the CYP is working (differentiated).
Individual learning styles are accommodated (visual, auditory, kinesthetic).
Where applicable planning relates to both academic and social/emotional outcomes.
Opportunities for literacy and numeracy development are identified.
Opportunities to develop independence and resilience are identified.
Opportunities for assessment and recording are identified.
There is an evidence trail showing how teachers evaluate the impact of their lessons and take action to implement improvements.
There is clear structure to the lesson.
The effectiveness of the individual intervention against the desired outcomes as identified by the commissioning body.
The appropriateness of marking and feedback in supporting learning, progress and self-esteem.
Acknowledgment marking – checking that the work has been completed and that there are no obvious mistakes that need correcting. The use of ticks, stamps or simple attainment based comments.
Quality teacher marking – positive comments which relate to the learning objectives /success criteria and a ‘What Next’ or ‘Next Steps’ comment which help CYP grasp what they need to do to improve/progress.
Opportunities for self-assessment – CYP are taught to comment against clear and agreed success criteria. This should allow them to gain a better understanding of where they are, where they need to be and what they need to do to get there. Self-assessment marks need to be identifiable as not the tutors marking.
Verbal feedback – involves frequent use of open and probing questions and an ongoing dialogue as work progresses.
Summative Feedback – tutors will provide comments on young people’s progress at the end of a unit or programme of work. Where appropriate, tutors will assess young people’s progress at the end of a unit.
End of intervention progress reviews – judgments at transition points which provide CYP with feedback regarding their progress towards outcomes and provide positive reinforcement.
The use of assessment to inform planning and teaching.
Progress within lessons and over time.
The quality of the learning environment.
Engagement and attitude to learning.
Sampling of teaching and learning will be recorded using our online recording documents .
Written feedback will be provided to tutors within 5 working days
5. Appendices
Self-Evaluation Quality Assurance (QA) Audit form
Sampling of Teaching and Learning Example
5.1. Self-Evaluation Quality Assurance (QA) Audit form:
Targeted Provision Ltd
Date of Audit: |
By: |
Actions/By when: |
Review: |
Completed/Extended/Dated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.2. Sampling of Teaching and Learning:
Targeted Provision Lesson Visit
We believe that the curriculum is everything we prioritise for our young people.
‘Good knowledge of the subject matter’ for us also includes a secure knowledge of the young person
Tutor: HA (TP Teacher) |
Learner: LC (24/09/20XX)
HA identified LC for a lesson visit. (Support with responding to health needs.) |
Date: 16/01/23 Lesson took place 09/01/23 at 1pm. |
Venue: Online |
Support Owner: NT |
Referral Owner: LU |
Focus of Session/Objectives:
Reading- LO: Participating in discussions about books, explaining their understanding of what they have read and providing reasoned justifications for their views. Maths- LO: To solve addition using the column method.
This is a new referral for HA, she has taken over from a previous tutor. This is the third session. |
||
Description of content: Building upon your rapport has been prioritised - time given to check in, shared interests established. Shared reading. Comprehension. Mental maths starter. Column addition. |
||
Intent - what is meant to be learnt?
curriculum is coherently planned and sequenced towards cumulatively knowledge and skills for future learning
|
||
Comment: You were very well planned in every sense of the word. Time and care has gone into incorporating LC’s interests. ‘Have you got your Pickachu I’ve got mine!’ She would like a career in animals (selection of stories). |
||
Implementation - how do you meet the intent?
good knowledge of the subject matter. subject matter is presented clearly, promoting appropriate discussion.. They check learners’ understanding systematically, identify misconceptions accurately and provide clear, direct feedback. respond and adapt their teaching. teaching is designed to integrate new knowledge into larger concepts. assessment is used well, to help learners embed and use knowledge fluently or to check understanding and inform. |
||
Comment: Knowledge of LC You support LC with her health needs demonstrating empathy, giving her time and ensuring she knows you are there. ‘Are you ok? I’ll give you a minute. Take your time - no rush.’ This was managed with respect and care. Perfectly! You give LC the ability to lead the learning and make choices - sense of autonomy. You listen to what LC has to say (comments/questions) and use this content to further expand LC’s experiences. You have obviously found out very quickly what works for LC and incorporated this into your sessions - humour was spot on! Good variety of resources are used that are presented differently - pace and LC’s interest. Constantly assessing and adapting your teaching. ‘Let me show you what I mean, let’s have a look at this.’ This comes naturally to you and ensures the flow of the session continues. Good use of open and closed questioning. . Reference made to previous learning and ideas discussed for developing LC’s knowledge and skills in the next session (3’s)
|
||
Impact - how effective was the implementation?
the young person develops knowledge and skills and, as a result, achieves well. |
||
Comment:
Extremely positive rapport established quickly - this was the third session. It is clear that LC trusts you. It was wonderful to watch the connection between the two of you. LC is confident to take risks and ask for help.
|
||
|
||
Summary of Professional Dialogue:
This session was great! Thank you for letting me watch it. What a joy LC is!
Gender conversation - LC is obviously interested. Just to be aware of this.
Support LC to record - how can we ensure time is used more effectively? Does Mum have a printer? Use of Bitpaper - you can prepare beforehand so that LC does not need to copy from the screen.
Mentioning your family members - say my son and not use his name (security).
HA raised the lack of Desired Outcome.
|
||
Agreed next steps: Have a play with Bitpaper. Draft outcomes for LC - Academic, Social and Outcome. |
Impact of next steps (date of follow up 31/01/23)
|
|
Teacher signature: HA Date: 19/01/23 |
Support Owner signature: NT Date: 19/01/23 |
|
